However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 21, 2017, the Defendant: “224, the 2018 Highest 224, the Defendant: (a) at an emergency center for the head of the Suwon Hospital of Gyeonggi-do Medical Center located in the vicinity of the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si on December 21, 2017; (b) provided that D, the police officer belonging to the Suwon-gu, the Police Station C District of the 119 Emergency Police Station, should be informed of the Defendant to receive medical treatment; (c) however, D, who attempted to go back without any confidence while refusing to do so, assaulted the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s personal attack and walking once again, thereby obstructing the police officer’s performance of duties concerning public safety and maintenance of order, such as the management of the police officer, etc. inside the hospital.

The Defendant, on March 27, 2018, at the house of the Victim F (59 years of age) in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul-si, 19:22 on March 27, 2018, provided a conversation with the Victim F (59 years of age) on the issues of the agreement of the assault case between himself and G during the conversation between himself/herself and G on the grounds that the victim did not have any part of his/her own, stated that the indictment was “Woo-ri,” but the indictment was written as “Woo-ri,” but the Defendant was found to have been in accordance with the evidence.

Clear recognition is very poor, and it is deemed that there is no concern about actual disadvantage in the exercise of the defendant's right of defense, so it shall be corrected ex officio.

One victim was assaulted by the method of threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 224"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each investigation report (the receipt of 112 reports, and analysis of CCTV video data, such as dispatch to the site, etc.);

1. CCTV image data CD 1878 "201 high group 1878";

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A written statement;

1. The investigation report (the list No. 1 of evidence);

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning telephone recording CDs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Articles 261 and 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special violence) against criminal facts, and each imprisonment with prison labor.