The Defendant, while under the influence of dials, abused money and valuables against those who were locked in the street, and thiefed the theft crime four times as follows.

1. On July 21, 2015, at around 04:00, the Defendant accessed the victim D, who was locked under the influence of alcohol, and carried out a verification wing-type of 50,000 won in cash owned by the victim, 200,000 won in the market price, 1 unit of LG smartphone, and 1 unit of panty smartphone equivalent to 200,000 won in the market price.

2. At around 02:00 on September 11, 2015, the Defendant accessed the victim FF, who was diving under the influence of alcohol, and carried 20,000 won of cash owned by the victim, as it is, KRW 20,000 won of the market price.

3. On September 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 02:20 on the street in front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) on September 20, 2015, the victim H, who was diving under the influence of alcohol, had 25,000 won or more at the market price, including 70,000 won in cash owned by the victim; (c) the Defendant carried 1 wall, and 1 smartphone, the market price of which is equivalent to

4. On September 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 02:05, the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government International Street, and (b) on September 27, 2015, to the victim J, who was diving under the influence of alcohol, Daced with the cell phone distribution box of a mobile phone equivalent to KRW 120,000,000 in the market price where Doctrine 1.50,000 won in cash

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each suspect interrogation protocol of the accused to the prosecution and the third police interrogation protocol;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each police statement of H, D, and J;

1. Each investigation report (for example, CCTV analysis, etc.), photographs, internal investigation reports (CCTV perusal), and each investigation report (including the attachment of video CDs, CDTV image verification) (CCTV verification) denies the crime under paragraph (1), but based on each of the above evidence.