On November 21, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) at the Suwon District Court on November 21, 2008, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 1, 2009.

On September 198, Defendant, C, and D conspiredd with the victims, who were the assistants of the “new type planning strike” formed for the purpose of securing funds for the organization of the Japanese violence group and entertainment establishments in nuclear cities in nuclear cities in nuclear cities, as well as the victims, who were officers of the “new type planning strike” established for the purpose of raising funds for the organization in bad faith.

1. The Defendant, C, and D, around 23:00 as of June 23, 201, intended that the victim G (19 years of age) want to withdraw from the F parking lot located in Won-si, Seoul, and the Defendant, C, and D set the victim into the above place, and C had D bring about the camping net, which is a dangerous object in his/her own vehicle, alkinium, and caused the victim to examine the wall in both hands, and 5 times the victim’s am her am her am with the above camping net, and the Defendant and D force the victim’s am her am in their surroundings.

As a result, Defendant, C, and D conspiredd with a dangerous object, resulting in an injury in which the number of treatment days could not be known, such as having the victim enter the victim, and making the victim enter the tampt.

2. On July 7, 201, at the early 01:00, the Defendant and C attempted to withdraw the victim H (22 years of age) from a new type planning staff member at the above F parking lot, and the Defendant and C set the victim’s amblock with alinium, which is an object dangerous to the above place, one time the victim’s amblock and ambl.

As a result, Defendant and C conspiredd with the victim with a dangerous object, and caused the victim to be tampered, so that the victim can not know the number of treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Each police statement of H and G;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the completion of the sentence, etc.), and investigation reports, respectively;