beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.03.20 2014고정1450

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2012, the Defendant received 50 million won from the security service business chain (ju) creative system from a person who was or was the Dong representative of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Da apartment district.

‘The suspicion' was raised.

1. Around August 30, 2013, the council of occupants’ representatives of apartment buildings that interfere with the business of September 3, 2013 decided to restrict the participation in the selection of security service providers of the said construction system on the grounds that the said construction system paid to the Defendant KRW 50 million.

At around 15:00 on September 3, 2013, the Defendant, at the meeting room of the tenant representative of the apartment management office, was dissatisfied with this, and the procedures for the selection of the security service company are being conducted, the Defendant failed to proceed with the procedures for the selection of the security service company under the supervision of F, the head of the apartment management office belonging to E, the victim, by making a large amount of sound for about 20 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the defendant's selection of security service company by force.

2. On December 12, 2013, the council of occupants' representatives of apartment buildings that interfere with the business of January 9, 2014 passed a resolution on the dismissal of the defendant's representative. The voting was held from January 8, 2014 to January 9, 2014, and the defendant was dismissed from the Dong representative on January 13, 2014.

Despite the suspension of the defendant's representative's duties until the above dismissal voting is finalized in accordance with the above apartment management rules, the defendant attended the meeting of the tenant representative held at the place specified in Paragraph 1 around January 22, 2014, and is asked from the Speaker pro tempore G to see the status of suspension of duties. However, the defendant means that "I attend the meeting by sending the message to attend the meeting by the management authority to attend the meeting, and I do not attend the meeting. I do not attend the meeting."