No one who violates the Fair Collection of Claims Act or defamation debt collector shall inform any person other than a debtor of false facts in connection with debt collection.

At around 19:10 on May 2013, the Defendant: (a) provided “G stores operated by the Victim F (hereinafter “F,” (hereinafter, 39 years of age) of the Jung-gu Incheon Building No. 103; and (b) provided excessive retirement pay rather than lending money to the Victim D; (c) however, the Defendant avoided contact with the Victim F by stating, “The Defendant: (a) provided that “The Victim D Co., Ltd, who was a partner of the Victim F, lent KRW 1,60,000 to B before his retirement; (b) provided false information about the obligation of a person other than the obligor; and (d) provided false information to the victim D by openly pointing out false information.”

(b) It shall not engage in any act seriously disturbing privacy or peace in business by demanding any person other than an obligor, who does not have any legal obligation to repay debts in violation of the Fair Collection of Claims Act, to cause fear or apprehensions by demanding the obligor to repay debts on behalf of the obligor;

At around 14:00 on May 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated, at the same time, the victim F in the instant G retail shop operated by the Victim F, that, “If the Defendant was paid a garry to receive money from her mother or her mother even at the mar’s house, she will file a complaint against the Defendant for the payment of the said mary money as a public fund.” (b) on behalf of the obligor, the Defendant bears the obligation on behalf of a person other than the obligor, who does not have any legal obligation to pay the debt.