When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 5, 2014, at around 22:10, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim D (the 51-year-old-old-old-old-old-gu-gu-U.D. (the 51-year-old-old-old-gu-gu-U.S.-old-gu-gu-U.S.-U.-U.-U.S.-E.-U.-E.-U.S.-E.-U.-E.-E.-U.-E.-E.-E.-U.-E.-S.-E.-U.-U.S.-E.-U.-U.-U.S.-E.-U.-E.-U.-U.S.-U.-U.-U.-A.-U.S.-A.-U.-U.-U.-U.S.-U.-U.-A.)

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Optional fine;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is difficult to have the Defendant’s economic condition, and the Defendant has no criminal power to commit the instant crime, taking into account the means and method of the instant crime, equity with other similar cases, etc., the amount of fine determined in the summary order cannot be deemed to have been imposed.