보험금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the plaintiff added the following "2. Additional Judgment" as to the assertion that the plaintiff emphasizes in this court, and each of the "the contract of this case" in the second, fourth, fourth, fourth, and 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "the insurance contract of this case", the "afford remaining disease pension" in the second, third, and fourth of the second, third, third, "afford remaining disease pension" as "af for a extended period", "af for a daily life" as "afford basic action", and the "af for a daily life head" in the third, third, third, third, as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the "af for the second, second, second, third, third, and third is a "fford ground for rejection" as "afford ground for appeal". Thus, this is
2. Additional determination
A. The main point of the plaintiff's assertion includes not only brain flag, which is an insured incident of the insurance contract of this case, but also 40% of the defendant's movement payment rate of the plaintiff's assertion that ① flag flag flaging both sides of the insurance accident of this case, and ② flag flaging two times due to the fall on two occasions due to the fall, and ② flag flagings that occurred after brain flaging, so the physical appraisal C of the defendant's movement in the separate insurance claim claim filed against the plaintiff was 50% of the disability of the defendant's aftermath flaging.
Therefore, considering the defendant's testimony, the moving disability rate is 20% (40% as a result of appraisal x 50%) and the total disability payment rate is 40% (80% as a result of appraisal x 50%). Moreover, the latter disability is limited to the case of one time insurance accident, and the latter disability is limited to the case of one time insurance accident, and the latter disability is limited to the case of one time insurance accident, and the latter disability is not included in the defendant's total disability payment rate. Thus, the latter disability is not included in the defendant's total disability payment rate, so long as it does not meet the requirements for insurance payment stipulated in the terms and conditions of the insurance contract of this case.