beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.06.30 2015노642

상해

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the victim E, witness H, etc.’s testimony and injury diagnosis report, etc., it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim E, as described in the facts charged.

B. The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (the amount of KRW 500,000) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the summary of the public prosecution room is the case of the victim E.

On August 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 13:00, at the Victim E’s house located in Western Si F, the victim did not pay approximately 30 years prior to the close container or 630 payments; (b) the victim was able to hold his head bonds on the ground that he had his head bonds and had the head bonds on his own; (c) the victim was salved by salving the head bonds; (d) the head, arms and legs were salved; and (e) the victim was salved by salking the head bonds of the victim; and (e) the victim was salved by sal

As a result, the Defendant brought up two parts, light, and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, which require treatment for about 14 days.

2) The lower court’s judgment: (a) the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated; (b) the victim was the Defendant at the time of the police investigation.

G Do also has pushed the victim and then the defendant has taken several times by generating the victim's body body.

In this court, G reversed the statement that there was no satisfy in this court as a witness, G reversed the statement that there was no satisfy, and stated that G will go in a flat color. ② At first, the victim filed a complaint with the above G, but became a disposition that there was no suspicion against G. ③ The victim had been treated with brain satfy and multiple satchitiss over 24 times from the beginning of 2014 to the time of the occurrence of the instant case. ④ According to the witness G’s statement in a third party position, according to the victim’s statement in the witness G, the victim started to put the above witness a sound, and saw within the room.