The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the assault of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, thereby infringing on the defendant's right of defense and failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations.

In addition, the argument that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense or a legitimate act is asserted by the defendant as the ground for appeal, or that the court below's decision was not subject to an ex officio decision, and it is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.