If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.

The defendant is the representative director of C (State) and C (State) is a company that engages in pre-paid installment transactions that provide goods and services necessary for family rites, such as wedding and funeral services, after receiving monthly certain amounts of money from its members in advance.

Despite the fact that a prepaid installment business operator is registered with the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, a Metropolitan City Mayor, a Do Governor, or a Special Self-Governing Province Governor, the Defendant, from March 19, 201 to December 19, 201, operated the said company without being registered with the competent authority of Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor, a Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor, from March 19, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of some police officers against the defendant or E;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Responses to request the verification of whether a business operator is registered or not, and notification of whether a prepaid installment business operator is registered;

1. Terms and conditions of accession by paper receipt and private assistant member;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 and Article 18 of the Installment Transactions Act, Article 3 of the Addenda, and the selection of a fine for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order begins with the Defendant’s succession to the above company in around 2006 by introducing, cancelling, or treating its members through introduction, cancellation, etc. after the succession to the company. At the time of the succession to the company, only about 20 members existed at around 700 members since the registration system under the Act on Installment Transactions in 700 members became effective. The extent of arranging and managing existing contracts against the above 20 members without joining a new member after the enforcement of the registration system is limited to the extent of mediating and managing the cancellation procedure or by providing a member’s exercise, etc. at the request of the above 20 members. After the expiration of the grace period for the registration system, the Defendant’s wife did not