수용재결취소등
1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,405,450 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from June 27, 2015 to January 12, 2017, and the following.
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Business approval and public announcement - Business name: A residential environment management project in the area around a park: A designation and public announcement of a district: March 2, 2015 of the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Notice No. 2015-7 and March 3, 2015 of the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Notice No. 2015-8-2: Defendant;
B. Decision on expropriation made on May 12, 2015 by the Incheon Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”): - On June 26, 2015, the date of expropriation: 102-58 square meters: 102-58 square meters, 102-59 square meters, 486.6 square meters, 102-83 square meters, 102-83 square meters, 102-101 square meters, 102-102, 113.1 square meters, 102-102, and 113.1 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) of the same land: The amount of compensation for losses, including the amount of compensation for losses, assessed by lots without regard to each of the instant land as a group of land.
C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection on October 22, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”): Compensation for losses: The amount of compensation for each of the instant lands assessed by parcel of each of the instant lands to be increased to KRW 1,085,032,50, the amount of compensation for each of the instant lands, including KRW 1,094,632,050, or the amount of compensation for obstacles.
D. As a result of the appraiser A’s appraisal, the said appraiser assessed each of the lands of this case by individual lots, and assessed the compensation for losses as follows, considering that each of the lands of this case is not indivisible for its use.
The fact that: (a) the appraisal value of the unit price applicable to the divided area (753.3 square meters), 102-58 116,560,560,000 180,960,960,000 182-59 486.61,390,390,000 676,374,0000 102-83 20.21,410,410,000 28,482,482,000 102-101,390,000 17.41,390,000 24,186,000 102-1,560,000 1,560,176,176,436,000 1,086,000 as a result of the appraisal of each appraiser Gap-38,00
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff purchased each of the land of this case in a lump sum for the construction of a welfare center around January 2005, and on January 4, 2006.