A and C Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,000, and Defendant B and D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant .

1. The Defendants C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a legal entity that was established on December 1, 2012 with the purpose of using 11 full-time workers in Chungcheongnam-si as well as manufacturing and selling construction equipment.

Defendant

B As the representative director of the defendant company, he is a person in charge of safety and health measures necessary for the prevention of industrial accidents, and the defendant D is a person in charge of assembly and electrical distribution of vehicles to be trucked as an electrical servant of the production department of the defendant company, and the defendant A is a person in charge of the production department of the defendant company.

2. When the commencement of operation of a machine is likely to cause danger to workers, Defendants B and A shall confirm in advance necessary matters, such as placement and education of workers, working methods, protective devices, etc., and shall take necessary measures to prevent the danger, and shall, if the operation of the machine starts, determine a certain signal method and a person signaled to the relevant worker, and have him/her signal the worker in accordance with the signal method, and shall take necessary measures to prevent any danger caused by the machinery, apparatus, or other equipment, such as stopping the operation of the machine, if there is a concern that the worker might be in danger at the time of maintenance, inspection, repair, or similar work of transportation machinery, construction machinery, etc.

Nevertheless, at around July 9, 2013, the Defendants neglected to perform their work, and had D workers work on a truck holding 2.5 tons of FM 2.5 tons in the production Dong of the Defendant Company without having determined the work method and order, and without having determined other workers work around the above vehicle under the influence of signal water, and whether the operation of the above vehicle was carried out under the influence of signal water.

Ultimately, the Defendants are employers.