공전자기록등불실기재등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 17]
1. The Defendant, in collusion with C, D, E, F, and G, had the intent to marry with the said F and G to enter the Republic of Korea, in order to use them for entry into the Republic of Korea without any marital intention or marriage between the said F and G, with the intent to make a false report of marriage.
Around May 2, 2008, the Defendant prepared a false report of marriage in the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office as if the above F and G were married, and submitted it to the public official in charge of family register affairs who is unaware of the circumstance to have the above public official record the false facts in the family register information system as if they were married, and had the public official in charge record the false facts recorded in the family register information system, which is a public electronic record, and had the public official in charge store and operate the false facts in the family register information system as above, and exercised the public electronic record by allowing the public official in charge to keep and seek the false facts in the family register information system as seen above.
In addition, from around that time to May 19, 2008, the Defendant recorded false facts in the family register information system, which is a public electronic record, on a total of six occasions as indicated in the following crime list, and exercised it.
On May 2, 2008, the Seoul Shiro-gu Family Register on May 2, 12008: (1) in collusion with the defendant, (2) C, D, (4) E, and disguised marrieds F, G, and false marriage report in collusion with the defendant, (2) C, D, E, and disguised marrieds, and (3) on May 2, 2008, the false marriage report was made; and (2) on May 2, 2008, the defendant I, “B(3) and disguised marrieds(2) C, H and disguised Marriage(3), K, and L on May 19, 2008, “(2)” < Amended by Act No. 8857, May 2, 2008; Act No. 874, May 19, 2008; Act No. 876, May 19, 2008; Act No. 885, May 12, 2008>
2. The Defendant is a victim who has placed an advertisement again in the newspaper of the intersection around June 2006.