The plaintiff was established and operated by F, and entrusted the plaintiff to Defendant B, his wife, around September 2003, and the representative director of the plaintiff is F's G.

Defendant B was in office as the representative director of the Plaintiff from October 1, 2003 to June 8, 2010. Defendant C was in office as the representative director of the Plaintiff from December 24, 2001 to December 24, 2007, and from June 2, 2008 to June 2, 2008, Defendant D was in office as each of the Plaintiff’s children of Defendant B from October 1, 2006 to October 1, 2006, and Defendant E was in office as the Plaintiff’s auditor from March 16, 2004 to March 31, 2007, and June 2, 2008 to June 1, 2008.

H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) is a company established by Defendant C on October 23, 1990. At the time of its establishment, Defendant C’s wife is the representative director at the time of its establishment. Defendant B is in office as the representative director from October 17, 2002 to October 17, 200, Defendant B is in office as the representative director at H. Of the total 111,00 shares of H, Defendant C holds approximately 9,00 shares ( approximately 8%) among the total shares of H, Defendant C is 3,00 shares ( approximately 30%) and 20,250 shares ( approximately 18%).

J Co., Ltd. (mutual name after the alteration: K., Ltd.; hereinafter the “J”) was established on February 27, 1995, and Defendant C was working as a representative director from January 6, 2002 to September 27, 2005. Defendant C was working as a representative director from January 28, 2008 to September 28, 2008. Defendant C’s wife I was working as a representative director from September 27, 2005 to September 11, 2007.

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s claim as to the Plaintiff’s ground of claim as to the Plaintiff’s ground of claim, Gap’s Nos. 1 (including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply), 2, and 9-1, and the entire pleadings, and the ground of claim as to the whole. However, the Defendants were to perform the Plaintiff’s duty of care as the officers. However, the Defendants were to provide loans, provision of security, and guarantee (1,87,157,596) to He without financial ability, and ② failed to recover management expenses from H (51,572,973 won), ③ failed to recover considerable amount of money in financial transactions with H (70,670,470 won).