beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.03.10 2016고단2616

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million, Defendant B, and C by a fine of KRW 400,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were engaged in the mobile phone sales business in the name of "F" from the Sungnam-gu E and the first floor of Sungnam-gu.

Defendants are in around October 8, 2015, G with a gallon 4 mobile phone (hereinafter “personal phone”) equivalent to the market value of 779,700 won.

B A certificate of illegal eradication was issued by G to the effect that “I will not resell the opened mobile phone concerned to another person” while selling B.

On the other hand, on October 9, 2015, G posted a statement on the sales of the above mobile phone on the Internet site of the Republic of Korea, at a place where it is impossible to know at the time of her compatibility. On the other hand, G posted a statement on the sales of the above mobile phone on the Internet site of the Republic of Korea. On the 11st of the same month, G sold the above mobile phone to the victim H (H(41 tax) who reported and contacted the above mobile phone with KRW 3.80,000,000, and the victim requested the above agency operated by the Defendants who did not function properly on the part of the above mobile phone to shift

Accordingly, when G knew that he sold the above mobile phone to the victim in violation of the prohibition of resale, the Defendants conspired to find out the above mobile phone from the victim, and Defendant A told the victim of the above agency that “I would exchange the mobile phone with a new product, and I would directly drive the above mobile phone with the above agency as the above agency because I would exchange the cell phone with a new product.”

Then, on October 15, 2015, at around 15:00, Defendant B and C move the victim to the above agency, let the victim sit in front of the Defendant and the above agency, and Defendant A put the victim under the influence of the above agency, and Defendant A put the victim under the influence of the above agency, and Defendant A put the victim into the cell phone. Defendant A put the victim into the cell phone at one time, and Defendant A put the victim into the cell phone. Defendant A puts the cell phone from the cell phone.

The term "the mobile phone is a mobile phone that can not be used by four times after subtracting a core chip from the mobile phone located on the sales stand" and "the mobile phone is a mobile phone that can not be used by four times."