A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, together on September 27, 2018 from around 14:00 to 14:34 of the same day, stated that Defendant A, at the Dda located in Yangsan-si, that he took a bath to other customers, the victim E (the victim, who is 51 years of age) called “I she would be hicking to a large number of people,” and the victim “I am hicking to a large number of people,” and the victim “I am hicking to a large number of people,” and the victim’s head and head were hicked with the victim’s head on his hand on the ground that the victim argued with Defendant A. Defendant B was her hand on the ground that the victim argued with Defendant A, the victim was hicked with the victim’s her hand, and the victim was hicking to the victim’s hick to the victim’s hand and the victim divided the victim’s hick to the victim’s left part.

As a result, Defendant A and Defendant B jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt dys, tensions, etc. in the cryp of the cryp for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Each internal investigation report and investigation report;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment);

(b) Defendant B: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act.

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who suspended the execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as “the grounds for the remaining sentence”), which is favorable to Defendant A

1. Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: In the case of Defendant A with the reason of sentencing Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the violence revealed in the method and form of the crime is reasonable.