When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 15:29 on October 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened one of the emergency handets, etc. at the market price equivalent to KRW 10,000, which was installed on the wall due to telephone conversations No. 201 of the victim C’s operation D private carbling 201, the Defendant destroyed and damaged it; (b) destroyed two small air conditioners at the victim’s corridor in the second floor, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 170,00,00, and one of the small air conditioners owned by the victim in the second floor, which was located on the corridor. (c) The Defendant destroyed and damaged two air condition conditioners at the rate of KRW 160,00,000, the market price of which was separated from the air condition.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's violent inclination is suspected of having been punished several times for the reason of sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, damage to property, and violence crimes. However, considering the fact that the amount of damage is relatively less than the amount of damage and that the defendant recognized the crime and appears to have divided the defendant's mistake, the decision of fine is made by taking into account the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment, motive of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be comprehensively taken into account.