If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a ESFM car.

On June 11, 2007, the defendant was admitted to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the coastwise Police Station on June 11, 2007 for the same year.

7. The same year upon receipt of a summary order of a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won for the same crime in the Daegu District Court's branch court;

8. 23. The punishment becomes final and conclusive, and is charged with the same crime at the racing police station on December 20, 2010, and is issued a summary order of a fine of one million won or more at the Daegu District Court and racing support on January 10, 201, and for the same year.

6. 9. The Road Traffic Act, such as the finality of the sentence, was violated not less than twice.

Nevertheless, at around 18:47 March 31, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol by 0.175% in a section of approximately 1km from the front road of the yellow field apartment located in the water-Eup in Yangsan-si, to the front road of the Yangsan National University Hospital located in the same Ri.

B. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) by driving the above vehicle at the same time as that of the preceding paragraph, and driving the front road of the hospital at the speed of about 20 km from the direction of the pan language elementary school along the speed of about four lanes.

At the time, it was difficult to move around at night, and there is a lot of cross-sections, so in this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right, and accurately manipulating the steering and the brakes, and thereby preventing accidents.

Nevertheless, due to negligence of driving under the influence of alcohol as in the preceding paragraph, the part of the victim C (Nam, 29 years old) waiting in the front direction of the defendant's running at the time was shocked by the front direction of the defendant as part of the front direction of the vehicle of the defendant.

In this way, the defendant is about two weeks to the victim and the victim E (n, 24 years old) by negligence in the above business.