At around March 25, 2013, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the case of violation of the Farmland Act against 2012 Go-Ma1605 C in the court No. 1, Sung-nam Branch of Suwon District Court, 16:20 on March 25, 2013.

In giving testimony as above, the defendant answers to the question "I am asked ... to the defendant's answer to the question "I am asked ... to the defendant", "I am 30 square meters", and the defense counsel asked 90 square meters "I am 90 square meters at the Myeon office", and the prosecutor asked 'I am 90 square meters at the Myeon office', "I am d have d with 18 square meters at the 18 square meters at the Myeon office, and I am 90 square meters at the 18 square meters at the Myeon office and 30 square meters at the Do, we see that I am more likely to increase the 30 square meters," and the prosecutor answers to the question "I am am" of "I am am.", and the prosecutor answers to the question "I am am..", and I am and answer to the questions "I am..."

However, the facts showed that D had not shown that D had obtained a permit 90 square meters from the defendant, and therefore, the defendant did not have received the above permit.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statements made by witnesses A (defendants) and D in the sixth and seventh trial records of the case No. 1605 of Suwon District Court 2012 High Court 1605;

1. The application of an agreement, the entry of new construction works, a detailed statement of withdrawal, notification of acceptance of construction report on each temporary building, an application for building permission, and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act: Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;