If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On January 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for the crime of indecent act by force by force by the Seoul Central District Court on January 17, 201, and is a person subject to the registration of personal information of which

If the basic personal information submitted is changed, the person subject to registration of personal information shall submit the reason and details of the change to the head of a police agency having jurisdiction over the domicile of the defendant within 20 days from the

1. Although contact details were changed to B around March 9, 2018, the Defendant did not submit without justifiable grounds to the head of the police station having jurisdiction over his/her domicile within 20 days.

2. The Defendant did not submit the changed details and reasons to the head of the police station having jurisdiction over his/her domicile within 20 days, without justifiable grounds, even though his/her workplace was changed to the Gangnam-gu Office E branch in Seoul on January 16, 2019.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on internal accidents in the police, screen pictures of personal information registration history data, reports on internal accidents in the police (statement of change of personal information), and reports on change and submission of personal information;

1. Response to a request for provision of communications data and a written submission of personal information (the fact of subparagraph 2 on the market);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on internal investigation by the police (subject matter of investigation by the suspect);

1. Application of statutes to the submission of personal information;

1. Article 50 (3) 2 and Article 43 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Selection of Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the selection of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) committed a second offense despite having been sentenced to a fine twice for the same kind of crime, the Defendant’s liability for the crime is not somewhat weak.

However, the defendant reflects the mistake, and the defendant reported the change of personal information after the crime of this case.