However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant driving a drinking-free car at around 22:50 on May 27, 2016, under the influence of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.145 percent at the section of approximately 50 meters from the Do in front of the mutual infi-si-free restaurant in the Dong of Pyeongtaek-si to the 416th ambi-ro of the same city-ro from May 27, 2016.

2. On May 29, 2016, the Defendant driving a drinking-free car at around 20:30 on May 29, 2016, under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.126 percent alcohol concentration on the part of approximately 1 kilometer from the Do in front of the delivery market in Pyeongtaek-si driving to the road front of the extension of the extension of the extension of the extension of the city at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The circumstantial report on the driver of each driving school;

1. Notification of the results of regulating driving of alcohol;

1. Each photograph (control site, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the next inquiry session;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (or choice of imprisonment with prison labor) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;