전부금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On September 11, 2012, a major stock company and the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of food materials (hereinafter “the instant goods supply contract”) with Samsung C&T Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant goods price”) on the following occasions: (a) the Defendant was established on December 1, 2013 due to the division of the meal service business and the distribution of food materials in the instant company; and (b) the Defendant succeeded to the rights and obligations related to the instant case).
B. A, on May 6, 2013, the preceding provisional attachment ruling was issued a provisional attachment ruling equivalent to the claimed amount among the claims for sales proceeds of KRW 5,1140,000,00 against the Defendant with a large amount of claims for sales proceeds of KRW 5,1140,00 against the largest amount of claims (Seoul District Court Decision 2013Kadan1290, hereinafter “decision on provisional attachment”), and the said provisional attachment ruling was served on the Defendant on May 7, 2013.
C. The Plaintiff’s attachment and assignment order 1) As between the largest on February 18, 2013, the Plaintiff’s issuance of a promissory note No. 95 of the 2013 Deed No. 2013, a notary public, as a notary public, as the Plaintiff’s respective addressees of the face value of KRW 80 million and KRW 700 million in face value of KRW 94 of the 2013 Deed No. 2013, the said promissory note No. 9
2) On May 15, 2013, the Plaintiff, based on the authentic copy of each of the instant deeds, received each of the instant claims attachment and assignment order (hereinafter “each of the instant claims attachment and assignment order”) as to KRW 700 million out of the instant claims for the instant goods under the jurisdiction of the Daegu District Court 2013TTTT664, and the said assignment order was served on the Defendant on May 21, 2013, and became final and conclusive on June 4, 2013.
The defendant who remitted the price of the goods of this case to the defendant's large amount is an assignment order of this case.