However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) the defendant;

On November 8, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the wooden branch of the Gwangju District Court on November 8, 2006, and on January 14, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).

On April 18, 2018, around 21:45, the Defendant driven a C Contract with C Contract Sale with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration 0.072% under the influence of alcohol, from the front of the North Sea Center in the North Sea Line, which was located on the North Korea Sea route, to the front road of the Seogpo-si, Supo City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (verification of the same type of force);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of protection and community service order, has been two times a fine due to the driving of drinking, but the accused has the time to commit the crime, and the accused has been repented, and the driving of drinking again is not possible;

The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the fact that the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc. is different.