When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On April 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above taxi on April 13, 2016, while driving the E-ray prior to the E convenience store in Jeju City was proceeding in the direction of Chocheon-gu Office in the direction of Chocheon-gu.

At the time, there is a center line of yellow solid lines, and traffic control is not likely to run, and in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well in the front of the course and safely proceed along the tea line.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeded to the left part of the G Kanop vehicle that was driven by the victim F (F, South, 44 years old) who was driven by the victim F (F, and the left part of the G Kanop vehicle at the scene of the accident.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and an investigation report on the actual condition of a traffic accident;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of black stuffs and images), CDs (hereinafter referred to as such images);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of traffic accidents;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Act and the Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is true that the defendant's overtaking the damaged vehicle and shocked the damaged vehicle, but the above drilling accident is caused by the wind of the defendant's own direction while proceeding to the right side of the moving direction as if the damaged vehicle would be bypass and making the left left left without turning on the direction of the injured vehicle.