성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(주거침입유사강간)
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
3.
Punishment of the crime
At around 03:00 on September 3, 2015, the Defendant entered the house of the victim D (n, 14 years of age) located in Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, by putting gas pipes and installing windows. In the room, the Defendant asked the victim's personal information by carrying the string in the lock with the human body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body.
As a result, the defendant invadedd the residence of the victim and committed acts of similarity to the victim by violence and intimidation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
2. Each police statement concerning D;
3. Data pertaining to replys to the results of appraisal;
4. Application of each statute of photography;
1. Relevant Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, Articles 319 (1) and 297-2 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment for life;
2. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
4. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) and (4) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;
5. In full view of all the circumstances revealed in the records, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation, environment, and family relationship, it is expected that the Defendant committed the instant crime dynamicly with the Defendant under the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse; the Defendant’s ex post facto agreement was reached with the victim; there was no record of punishment for sexual crimes; the young who reached age 32 is expected to improve his/her personality and conduct in the future; and other records, such as the Defendant’s age, character, and character, occupation, environment, and family relationship.