However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a singing practice hall with the “C Sing practice hall” in Ansan-si, the Defendant is a person who operates the singing practice hall.

No singing practice room business operator shall sell or provide alcoholic beverages within his/her place of business.

Nevertheless, around January 28, 2016, the Defendant violated the obligations of the singing practice provider by providing five cans to D who visited customers within the specialty room of the above “Cing practice hall” (hereinafter “Cing practice hall”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to registration certificates for singing practice place business;

1. Article 34 (3) 2 of the Music Industry Promotion Act and Article 22 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The age, sex, environment, background of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., of the majority of the criminal offenders who have been committed against the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act;