2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's acknowledgement of his mistake and reflects on the fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed by deceiving many unspecified victims by active means, and the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak in light of the method of crime and the frequency of crime, etc., the defendant's payment of damages to victims up to the trial, or did not reach agreement with victims, the defendant was punished due to a similar crime, or the records of juvenile protective disposition are several times, such as the defendant's failure to attend the trial of the court of the court below and proceeding by service by public notice, it is difficult to expect the effect of preventing recidivism. In light of the above circumstances, considering the above circumstances, considering the fact that it is difficult to expect the defendant to take account of the motive and circumstance leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character, behavior, environment, etc., the sentencing of the court below is too inappropriate. Thus, the above defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per

(However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, five acts under the bottom of the judgment below to “from October 1, 2013” shall be corrected to “from October 2, 2013.”