원인무효에 의한 소유권이전등기말소
1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the Appointeds B are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Plaintiff.
The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: Gap's evidence added at the court of first instance, which is insufficient to recognize the fact that the plaintiff's acquisition of consultation on each remaining land of this case does not take effect, Gap's evidence Nos. 19 through 22, Gap's evidence No. 24-1 through 3, Gap's evidence No. 25, 26, Gap's evidence No. 27-1, 27-2, Gap's evidence No. 28, Gap's evidence No. 29-1 through 10, Gap's evidence No. 30-1 through No. 30-11, and Gap's evidence No. 23-1 through No. 19 are the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.