If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 20, 2013, the Defendant operated the said car on June 20, 201:42, and proceeded directly with the intersection of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Bupyeong-gu Seoul, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, as the NAT-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si.

Since a signal, etc. is installed, there is a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle passes the intersection by checking well the left and right of the motor vehicle, and to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to enter the intersection beyond the stop line as it was in violation of it, and the Defendant did not discover the rocketing personal taxi which is driven by the victim D (the aged 49) who is driven by the direct turning signal from the left side of the direction of the course of the course to the right side of the road at the same side of the zone above the stop line, and received the victim's front portion of the taxi in front of the left side of the Defendant's car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dynasium, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.