beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고단4748

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had a complaint against the Defendant, who was a victim C (math, 50 years of age, and death on May 22, 2017) against the Defendant, who was sexually female, that he was not the male, and found a photograph, etc. that the victim sawd from D’s mobile phone with D, who was not the husband, and saw that he was able to transmit it to the victim and its neighbors again after transmitting it to the cell phone of the victim.

1. The same year, including sending the Defendant’s text message “F” operated by the Defendant in the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E market from March 14, 2017 to March 16:45 to 21:51, using the Defendant’s mobile phone, using the victim’s mobile phone Kakakao Stockholm and text message, the victim sent five copies of the video and photograph with singing together with the victim’s cell phone, and continuing to send one of them.

4. By up to 17:44 on December 12, 198, sending text messages, etc. 13 times in total, as described in the list of offenses in the attached Form;

The article that arouses fear and apprehensions through information and communication network has repeatedly arrived at the victim.

2. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

가. 피고인은 2017. 3. 15. 10:13 경 위 ‘F ’에서, 피고인의 휴대전화로 같은 시장에서 야채가게를 운영하는 G의 휴대전화로 피해자가 D와 주점에서 껴안고, 함께 노래를 부르는 사진 5 장 및 ‘ 아니라고 발뺌하더니 이러고 다니네요

“In order to transmit the text message to the victim and to defame the victim, the victim undermined the victim’s reputation by openly exposing facts through an information and communications network.

B. On April 2017, the Defendant: (a) was the victim’s cell phone outside of the instant case where the Defendant had been operating the static point in the same market as the Defendant’s cell phone; and (b) was the victim D.