However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a driver with B B spacks.

On December 27, 2016, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 30 km from the side of the semi-monthly park to the elementary school at the speed of about 30 km.

Since there is an intersection, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right, and to accurately operate the steering direction and the system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was driving by the victim D, who was driving by negligence while neglecting his duty at the front time and was driving by the Defendant on the front part of the above cargo vehicle which the Defendant was driving by negligence on the front side of the Oral Middle School.

E In order to damage the 494,395 won of the repair cost of the above cargo driven by the victim with the right-hand part of the cargo vehicle.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act: (a) operated the instant B b plb feb fews without mandatory insurance, at the time, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph; and (b).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Written estimate of maintenance;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes related to each accident;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2, the main sentence of Article 8 (main sentence) of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, with labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do111, May 1

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act concerning the observation of protection and order to attend lectures;