구상금
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant A is the owner and driver of “BM3 Passenger Vehicles” and Defendant M&3 Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Defendant A with respect to the said automobiles.
B. In the event of a traffic accident against Defendant A, around October 10, 2013, Defendant A driven the said car on or around 7:00 p.m., and continued to run a shooting distance in front of the Samsung-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Samsung Digital Service Center as a regular district screen. The above shooting distance began to run a traffic accident (hereinafter “the accident in this case”) in which Defendant A, who was driven by the said car in accordance with C (17 years old) along the opposite line for delivery of madin, was faced with the central line from the shooting distance to the third-lane of the opposite line in order to immediately enter the said well-known apartment.
As a result, C is under hospital treatment until now after suffering from injury, such as sloping 5-6 of Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, the lower part of the right-hand frame, the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the river, and stress after wound.
C. The Plaintiff’s payment of insurance benefits to C 1) The Plaintiff recognized the injury suffered by C due to the instant accident as an industrial accident (hereinafter “victim”).
(2) From October 10, 2013 to June 1, 2017, an amount calculated by adding an amount of injury or disease pension 28,904,270, which has the nature of temporary disability compensation benefits as temporary disability compensation benefits in KRW 36,190,40 from October 10, 2013 (Evidence A1) to the victim as follows. The injury or disease is not cured even after two years have passed since the commencement of the medical care.