명예훼손
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. From March 2011, the Defendant filed a complaint, complaint, and application for adjudication with respect to child abuse of the above childcare center several times, asserting that “the children of the Defendant attending the childcare center operated by the victim C were abused from the above childcare center” and concluded that “the competent investigation agency did not cause child abuse at the childcare center operated by the victimized person.” The Busan High Court dismissed the Defendant’s application for adjudication on the same ground, and the Defendant was well aware of the aforementioned contents.
Nevertheless, at around December, 2013, at the defendant's house located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, the defendant sent the video of the above CCTV of the victim at his own discretion to the competent division in charge of the case where the defendant had been tried, thereby securing through the defendant's attorney-at-law the amount of one month, 30 video of the above CCTV video, which arbitrarily selected 16 pages of the above CCTV video, and re-ed up only 16 pages of the above CCTV video, and "the victim has sustained additional child abuse at the children's house operated by himself/herself.................., the defendant continued to transmit the video of the above 16 pages of the screen containing the above 16 pages to the E-mail of Ulsan KBS broadcasting station reporter at the same place, and the defendant should not be held to have the above CCTV granted the defendant's name-based producer of SBS culture program "F" to secure continuous child abuse from the child's house.
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.
2. Taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court: