공갈
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
1. The court below found the defendant not guilty on the grounds of the judgment as to the conflict of interest, which is the primary charge related to L of the victim, and sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for two years and six months with prison labor, recognizing the facts of fraud, which is the ancillary charge, and the remaining charges. While the prosecutor appealed on the guilty part, the prosecutor did not appeal on the acquittal part of the reason, but the part of the primary charge, which is within the scope of identity and identity, is transferred to the court below.
2. Summary of grounds for appeal;
가. 피고인 1) 사실오인 피고인은 판시 범죄사실 기재와 같이 L을 기망하지 않았고, 기망과 처분행위 사이에 인과관계가 없으며, L이 피고인에게 지급한 돈은 보신용 한약재인 백호(白虎) 음경에 대한 매각대가일 뿐이다(사기의 점). 피고인이 A로 하여금 불법대출을 빌미로 N을 협박하여 금품을 받아내기로 A와 공모하지 않았고, A에게 지시하지도 않았으며, A에게 한 여러 조언은 정당한 행위에 해당한다(공갈의 점). 2) 법리오해(공소장변경허가 위법) 피해자 L과 관련한 변경 전 주위적 공소사실인 공갈의 점과 변경 후 추가된 예비적 공소사실인 사기의 점은 행위 태양이 달라 공소사실의 동일성의 한계를 벗어난 것임에도 원심이 공소장변경을 허가한 것은 위법하다.
3) The sentence sentenced by the lower court on unreasonable sentencing (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.
3. Judgment on the mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles by the defendant
A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts as to the fraud, i.e., N, the representative director of (M)M, took out a loan of KRW 35 billion for the increase of capital on July 4, 201, and attached thereto.