beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.10 2014가합65857

예금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 846,843,306 for the Plaintiff and KRW 20% per annum from June 26, 2014 to September 30, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that aims at the construction business of civil engineering and construction. The Defendant is a corporation established pursuant to the Credit Unions Act for the purpose of credit business, such as the receipt of deposits and installment savings from its members. 2) The Plaintiff newly constructed the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment (hereinafter “F apartment”), the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G apartment, and the Young-gu H apartment (hereinafter “each of the above apartment”) by combining them.

B. In conclusion of the business agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Defendant’s loan 1), the Defendant around 2010 entered into a business agreement with the Plaintiff and the executor of each apartment of this case regarding the lending of the down payment to the buyers (hereinafter “instant business agreement”).

The main contents of the business agreement were as follows (the business agreement was entered into for each apartment.)

(3) In the event that a purchaser delays the repayment of a loan due to the occurrence of the causes as prescribed in Article 7 (Loss of Benefit of Time) of the Convention, the event of the purchaser and the plaintiff must terminate the sale contract and use the refund of the sale price to be paid to the buyer in advance of the buyer in advance of the buyer in advance of the buyer in lots (including damages for delay and incidental obligations) under the consent of the defendant in accordance with paragraph (1) of this Article.

) Resale (if sold or transferred, the buyer loans the down payment with the approval of the defendant.