2. In full view of the factors such as the Defendant’s disability in the third degree of physical disability, the economic situation is not good, the Defendant’s favorable sentencing factors such as the fact that there was an agreement with the victims, the fact that the victims have been subject to criminal punishment several times of the same kind of crime, and the fact that the victims have been continuously prevented from committing the same kind of crime, and other unfavorable sentencing factors such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the circumstances after the crime, and the scope of the recommended sentence of the sentencing guidelines (two months to one year and six months), it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.