1. The Defendants’ injury by robbery are combined with the Defendants on June 19, 2013, at the street in front of the F convenience store located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-gu, and the victim G (34 years of age) from the above convenience store was discovered, and the victim’s identity was turned back to the alleyway of the victim, and the victim was turned back to the alley of the four son, and the Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “A”) took part of the victim’s body and took part of the victim’s 1 disease together, and then maths back the bank owned by the victim. The victim said that the victim followed the victim’s rear and returned the bank to the victim. Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “B”) led the victim to the back of the victim, and enticed the victim into H in front of the alley.

Defendant

A When you drink the face of the victim by drinking at this place, Defendant B plucked the victim's arms, and plucked the victim's arms, and plucked the victim on the floor, and the defendants frighted the victim who want to fright up to the floor, frighting the resistance by drinking, walking the victim, etc., and 20,000 won in cash, which is owned by the victim, b20,000 won in total, and b20,000 won in a household project consisting of the victim's cash 20,000 won in cash, and boomed the victim on the left side side and the bucker for about three weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly taken the victim's property by force and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. On June 20, 2013, Defendant A: (a) around 06:00 on June 20, 2013, Defendant A: (b) took advantage of the gaps in which surveillance was neglected due to the victim K’s failure to do so; (c) took advantage of the gaps in the victim K’s head, Defendant A’s 80,000 won smartphone, which the said victim left on the head side of the head, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

【Paragraph 1 of this Article】

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A witness G’s legal statement from the investigative agency to this court is consistently stated in the circumstances at the time of the crime, and CCTV images are also made.