If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, only 100,000 won.

At around 04:20 on June 8, 2018, the Defendants: (a) within the D office located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, D, on the ground that Defendant A made the victim E (the age of 55) to speak against the Defendants; (b) Defendant A used the victim to assault the Defendants; (c) Defendant A used the victim’s head in his hand; (d) transferred the victim’s face to the victim’s face; (e) Defendant B took the victim’s body one time by hand; and (e) Defendant B took the victim’s face.

As a result, the defendants suffered the injury of the 1st lup lup lup lup lup lup lup lup lup lup lup l lup lup lup lup lup lup lup

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. On-site photographs;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the same Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though all the Defendants had been punished several times due to violent crimes, etc., committed the instant crime.

It cannot be deemed that the injury suffered by the victim is light.

However, it appears that the crime was committed in response to the victim's attack, and the defendants are against the victim's acknowledgement of the crime, and the defendants agree with the victim and agree with the victim that they were not punishable.

In full view of the motive and background of the crime including the above circumstances, the method and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age, environment, and criminal record, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.