When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 16, 2019, at around 19:17, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as: (b) in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon; (c) “I Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do ,” and “I Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Do Do Do Do Do , who was dispatched after receiving 112 a report; and (d) Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Do Do Do Do Do Do , who was the superior of this

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, the details of receipt of reports; and

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is likely to be criticized in that not only prevents police officers from maintaining the order of police officers, but also can promote light of legal order and public authority.

However, the defendant is now against his or her will to recognize his or her mistake.

There is no specific penalty power for the accused.

In addition to this, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, degree of exercise of force against police officers, and circumstances revealed in the trial process shall be determined as ordered by considering all the circumstances.