사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 13, 2015, from around 21:00 to 01:05 of the following day, the Defendant was able to pay the amount in the “E” entertainment tavern operated by the victim D, who was in net City C, as if he were to pay the amount, and ordered the victim to provide alcohol, alcohol, etc.
However, in fact, the defendant did not have cash to pay the above price, and there was no deposit in the accounts connected to the e-mail card, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcohol, algorith, etc. from the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, did not pay the amount of money equivalent to KRW 130,00,00,000, even though he had been provided property and services equivalent to the total of KRW 17,00,00,000 from the victim and had the victim informed of the above injury.
2. The Defendant was asked to question G of the Fa of the Macheon Police Station, who was called upon the report that there was a person who does not pay the drinking value at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), and on the grounds that he did not pay the drinking value from G of the Facheon Police Station affiliated with G, security guards, and H, and asked to “I, G, and H, by applying mutatis mutandis, that “I am frien, frien, frien, frien, frien, frien, frien, frien, frien, frien.”
In the inspection, as the body was frighten, the body was frightened, and the body was brightened by H to the end that “not to take a bath” from H, and the body was brightened to take the attitude of making the drinking at the site and H.
On March 14, 2015, the Defendant continued to be arrested in the act as above, and handed over to the F box of the net police station located in YA at YA on March 14, 2015. At this point, during the investigation into the instant case, the Defendant told H that “it was aware of the recent shot gun murder case” and told H as if he were to take a retaliation, thereby threatening H.
On March 14, 2015, the Defendant continued to do so at around 03:20.