However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 2, 2015, around 05:00, the Defendant: (a) around D main points in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) around the D main points, spiting spite on the victim E (Nam and 27 years of age) and spite on the floor; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant was spite in a dispute; (d) on the other hand, the victim meted an empty disease, which is a dangerous object at the main points; and (e) faced the victim’s head; and (e) caused the Defendant’s injury to the two open main points in need of two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect of the police accused;

1. Statement of E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photograph of damaged place and diagnostic certificate (Evidence No. 3, 5);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution [Scope of recommending punishment] The case where: (a) category 1 (Habitual Injury, Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury, Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury, Special Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodi Bodily Injury); (b) minor injury; (c) minor injury; (d) not having been punished (including serious efforts to recover damage); or (d) considerable partial damage has been recovered