Of them, the part against Defendant A and each offender committed against Defendant B on June 18, 2008 and August 6, 2009.

A. Defendant A1) misunderstanding of facts (the part of the case in 201Da3660) (the case in 201DaDa3660) did not make the victim D with dangerous things together with N and F, and there was no fact that the defendant threatened the victim D with M and F, and caused the victim K to threaten the victim D. At the time, the Defendant: (a) stated that “When she was wrong, she did not take part in the crime in N and others; (b) did not take part in the crime; (c) did not take part in the crime; and (d) did not take part in the crime in N and others; and (d) did not take part in the assault against the victim D. Nevertheless, the lower court, which recognized the facts charged, did not know at all. Nevertheless, there was an error of misunderstanding of facts in matters of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles (part 2) and in matters of misunderstanding of facts and calculation of the total amount of the proceeds of the crime in the name of F.

3) The sentence of the lower court on the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing (two years and six months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable and unfair. (b) The sentence of the lower court on the Defendant B (the part on the crime of capital punishment, which was committed by the Defendant on November 15, 201) is too unreasonable and unfair. (c) The prosecutor’s (the part on the crime of capital punishment) of the lower court on the Defendant B, who operated the large-scale speculative game site. The prosecutor’s (the Defendants were to reverse the statement on the grounds of the branch office referred to as the Defendant B while operating the large-scale speculative game site, thereby inducing the criminal escape, and committing serious injury by assaulting the employees of the above game site; (d) the Defendant led to the confession of the fact that he was punished through a minor punishment of eight months of imprisonment with prison labor; and (e) attempted to actively conceal the Defendant A’s criminal act by asserting that he was a vocational owner.