Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant.

2. Determination

A. The lower court rendered a judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

B. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court in light of the circumstances alleged by the lower court in its reasoning, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

① At the lower court’s court, G entered into the instant sales contract on its own land as F’s intermediary; “F was aware of the fact that it was the actual president of the D Authorized Broker; the Defendant did not know at all; and “F was the actual president of D Authorized Broker.”

(2) The F made a statement (75 pages of the trial record) that he was under investigation by the investigative agency on the instant case, and he was under investigation by the investigative agency, and he was under investigation by the E and was under the title of the real estate office of this case (Evidence No. 19, No. 73 of the evidence record). In the court of the court of the court below, the court of the court below stated that he had no fact that he had the defendant render brokerage services using the name and trade name of the defendant (the 136th page of the trial record). While he was investigated by the investigative agency on the instant case where he was accused of intrusion on his structure or forgery of private documents, he was under investigation by the investigative agency, he was under investigation by E, and was under investigation by the real estate office of this case

(3) In a case where the defendant accused F by intrusion upon a structure or fabrication of private documents, the prosecutor took a disposition that the prosecutor was not suspected (insufficient evidence) (168 pages of the trial record), and (2).