If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Around December 19, 2011, the Defendant prepared a written complaint to the effect that “D would find employment without the intention or ability to find a woman of the A's prior ship that is the complainant, and would have been punished by receiving 30 million won and receiving 30 million won.” On March 30, 201, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint to the employees in poor name in the public service station in the above public service center, and made a false statement to the effect that “D would find employment with the OCI's intention or ability to find employment with the complainant's prior ship, which is the complainant, at the office of the above police station investigation and the 1st team office.”

However, the fact that the defendant only lent the money to the above D as a fund for medical engineer business, and did not provide money under the above job placement.

Accordingly, the defendant had the above D with the aim of having the D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement, each prosecutor's office investigation protocol against the defendant, and D

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 (Confession) of the Criminal Act, which are statutory mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;