However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 17, 2018, the Defendant driven a B-AD car on March 12:10, 2018, and was straighted by the new name in the direction of the U.S. in the direction of the U.S. in the direction of the U.S. in the direction of the opening of the U.S. from the S. police station of Seongbuk-gu, Seoul to the S. S. S. S. located in the direction of the U.S. in the direction of the U.S.

C Driving D. D. D. D. D. Driving (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) expressed a warning to f.m. “C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C’s direction on the road in front of the damaged vehicle in the same Gu E., while driving about about 100 meters along the three-lanes, the right side of the damaged vehicle, without turning into the direction, etc. in the future of the damaged vehicle. C. C. C. C. C. was temporarily stopped and was driven by the back part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, using a dangerous object vehicle, inflicted injury on the victim G (at the age of 30) who was accompanied by the lower seat of the damaged vehicle (at the age of 30), such as fluoral salt fluor requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time, damaged the victim H-owned vehicle in excess of KRW 70,864 of repairing cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. G statements;

1. Deposit sheet, estimate for automobile inspection, delivery of automobile parts, and request for payment;

1. A medical certificate;

1. An analysis of traffic accidents;

1. Report on investigation (booming analysis) and application of shot Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1), 369 (1), and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Articles 53 and 55 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of small amount (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 2

1. The Defendant’s retaliation for sentencing reasons under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a dangerous crime that may cause substantial damage to the other party.

provided, however, that the victim is also a victim.