A. The punishment of eight months of imprisonment sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. As to each of the unfair sentencing arguments by the Defendant and the prosecutor, the following facts are examined: (a) the Defendant’s and the prosecutor’s each of the following facts were examined; (b) the Defendant’s horses were heard from the victim of female-friendly job offers who was dead; (c) the victim was threatened with the victim’s residence; and (d) the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victim; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s disadvantageous circumstances, such as the fact that he did not receive a letter from the victim; (d) the Defendant recognized the instant facts charged; and (e) the Defendant reflects his mistake; and (e) other favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable; and (e) the Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. Thus, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.