On May 25, 2012, the Defendant submitted to the public service center of the Incheon Jung-gu Office of Police Station in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon. On May 23, 2012, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with D around 04:0 on May 23, 2012, and had no raped from D, despite the fact that D had been raped, D submitted to the employee in charge of the lack of name a written complaint stating false facts to the effect that D had D raped a person under the influence of alcohol at the time and time for the purpose of having the criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. A complaint;

1. The Defendant asserts that the contents of the instant complaint were true, since the Defendant was raped from D, as to the Defendant’s assertion on CCTV photographs, investigation report (CCTV photography CDs and outputs attached).

Therefore, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence, i.e., the defendant was somewhat at the time of entering the D and Cel, but it is difficult to view that the defendant was at the entrance of the Moel as being unable to memory the sexual relationship with D or to distinguish whether he was rape or not, according to the video recorded in the CCTV installed in the Moel, it is difficult to regard the defendant's appearance from D and Maurgate as a victim of rape after sexual intercourse. If the defendant was raped with D after sexual intercourse, there is no evidence to deem that the request was made even if he could have been requested for assistance from D, E, F, G, H, and instead, after sexual intercourse with D, he went through the her sexual intercourse with D and again came into the her maternal relationship with the her mother, and the defendant did not have sexual intercourse with D, in light of the fact that the defendant had sexual intercourse with D and the 2nd her mother.