If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant was a person who was a partner of the redevelopment of the area C in Busan Dong-gu, and the complainant D is the head of the redevelopment partnership.

1. On May 24, 2010, the Defendant prepared a written agreement stating the commitments in paragraphs (1) through (7) in relation to the partnership on the condition that the complainant supports the election to the partnership head, and then altered the agreement containing the phrase “in the event that the complainant is elected to the partnership head, the future litigation costs shall be borne by D” as stated in paragraph (8).

2. On March 7, 2012, the Defendant submitted to the public service center of the Busan District Court, which was located in the Busan District Court's Dong-gu, the above modified agreement to the above employee who could not know the fact of the alteration, and exercised it as if it was duly constituted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Written appraisal by the chief of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the written complaint and attached agreements;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;