beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.23 2017고단3774

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 05:50 on April 2, 2017, the Defendant driven a e-mail-type vehicle with approximately 650 meters alcohol concentration of 0.115% from the 18-lane 92-ro, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, to the same Gu D, while under the influence of alcohol.

2. 공무집행 방해 계속하여 피고인은 2017. 4. 2. 06:55 경 인천 서구 D 앞 도로에서, ‘ 차량에 시동을 켠 채 운전자가 자고 있다' 는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 인천 서부 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 경찰 공무원인 순경 G가 피고인을 깨우자, “ 씹할 년 아, 왜 지랄인데 씹할” 이라고 욕설을 하고, 위 스포 티지 차량에서 내린 후 주먹으로 순경 G의 가슴을 2회 때리고, 이에 같이 출동한 위 지구대 소속 순경 H가 피고인을 공무집행 방해의 현행 범인으로 체포하려고 한다는 이유로, 주먹으로 순경 H의 얼굴을 2회 때려, 112 신고에 따른 경찰관의 질서 유지 및 수사업무 등에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on the circumstances of drivers working at the State, on-site photographs, and investigation reports;

1. When a person interferes with the performance of his/her official duties under Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act for a crime: Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties in the judgment);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the defendant was punished for drinking or driving without a license; (b) the defendant committed a second offense; and (c) it is not good to the circumstances and contents of the crime, such as assaulting the police officer; and (d) the defendant did not receive a letter from the victimized police officers until now.