beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고단1012

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three months for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 27th of the same month, and is currently under suspension of execution. On March 31, 2017, the Defendant was detained by assault, etc. with the Seoul Central District Court and is currently under suspension of trial.

[2] On November 2017, the Defendant, at the residence of the Defendant located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, in Eunpyeong-gu (Seoul) and around November 2017, posted a notice as if he/she sold a siren clock and a siren clock on the Internet or on the Internet, thereby deceiving the victims who reported and contacted, thereby deceiving them.

1. On November 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported on around November 24, 2017, that the Defendant sold a siren clock clock, posted in the smartphone clock market; and (b) transferred KRW 300,000 to the victim D, who contacted, KRW 30,00,000.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not pay mobile phone charges and did not have an intention to sell the said bags even if he/she received 300,000 won from the injured party, in a situation where money is needed due to the lack of living expenses.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 300,000 won from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account (E) in the name of the mother of the defendant from the victim to take over the money for the goods.

2. On December 22, 2017, the Defendant, on December 22, 2017, transferred KRW 510,000 to the victim F, who reported and contacted that he/she sold a siren clurine clurine, posted on the Internet, and that he/she sold a siren clurine clurine, posted on the Internet, and that he/she would send the said bags and shoes.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, on November 24, 2017, the Defendant seems to sell the above goods in the circumstances where damage changes due to fraud and mobile phone charges and living expenses are required.